Hampshire County Council
Feedback Summary -
November
Hampshire County Council (HCC) has garnered a diverse array of customer feedback, reflecting the multifaceted nature of public service delivery within the region. The aggregate customer satisfaction rating stands at an average of 3.8 out of 5.0, indicating a generally favorable perception among constituents, albeit with notable areas for improvement.
Service Accessibility: Average Score 4.1
Customer feedback regarding service accessibility reveals a commendable average score of 4.1. Respondents frequently commend the council's efforts to provide multiple channels for service engagement, including online platforms and in-person consultations. However, some constituents express concerns regarding the digital divide, particularly among older demographics, who may encounter challenges in navigating online services. This dichotomy underscores the necessity for HCC to enhance outreach and support for less digitally literate populations.
Responsiveness: Average Score 3.5
The dimension of responsiveness receives a moderate average score of 3.5. While many customers appreciate the promptness of initial contact, there are recurrent criticisms regarding the timeliness of follow-up actions and resolutions. Stakeholders have articulated a desire for more transparent communication regarding the status of inquiries and complaints, suggesting that improvements in this area could significantly bolster public trust and satisfaction.
Quality of Services: Average Score 3.9
In terms of service quality, HCC achieves an average score of 3.9. Feedback indicates that while many services, such as waste management and public health initiatives, are perceived as effective, there are notable discrepancies in the quality of service delivery across different departments. Customers have highlighted inconsistencies in staff training and resource allocation, which may detract from the overall efficacy of service provision.
Community Engagement: Average Score 3.6
Community engagement is another critical dimension, with an average score of 3.6. While HCC has made strides in fostering community involvement through consultations and public forums, feedback suggests that many residents feel their voices are inadequately represented in decision-making processes. Enhancing participatory mechanisms could facilitate a more inclusive governance model, thereby improving overall community satisfaction.
In conclusion, while Hampshire County Council demonstrates a solid foundation of customer satisfaction, targeted improvements in responsiveness, service quality, and community engagement are essential for enhancing the overall public perception and efficacy of its services.